Case Study — Aerospace / Turbomachinery

Inconel 718 Impeller 5-Axis CNC Machining Case Study

A 248 mm turbomachinery impeller with 17 curved blades, machined from solid Inconel 718 in a single primary setup. This page documents the customer requirement, the engineering constraints, how the part was actually made, and what was measured before it shipped.

Part
Turbomachinery impeller
Material
Inconel 718
Process
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC
Machine
DMG MORI DMU 50
Lead Time
8 business days
Project Overview

Project Overview

This impeller brought together three constraints that are individually manageable but difficult in combination: a nickel-based superalloy with poor machinability, blade geometry that severely restricts tool access, and blade-to-hub relationships that could not tolerate datum transfer between setups.

The part is a 248 mm diameter impeller with 17 curved blades, machined from solid rather than from a casting. Machining from solid removes the variables that come with cast blanks — porosity, inconsistent allowance, and the datum ambiguity of a near-net shape — but it puts the entire material removal burden onto the cutting strategy.

Rather than present this as a showcase, this page is written as an engineering record: what the customer asked for, what made the part difficult, which decisions were taken and why, and what evidence was produced. If you are evaluating whether the same discipline can be applied to your own geometry, the Inspection & Verification and Final Result sections are the ones that matter.

Xiamen Goldcattle Plastic & Metal Products Co., Ltd. has been manufacturing custom precision components since 1998, operating under an ISO 9001:2015 certified quality management system.

Customer Requirement

Customer Requirement

What the customer specified on the drawing and in the RFQ — the reference everything downstream was measured against.

Part description
Turbomachinery impeller with curved blade passages
Material
Inconel 718 (AMS 5662 / UNS N07718)
Quantity
Per customer RFQ
Critical features
17 curved blade passages; hub-to-blade profile continuity; bore and mounting datum
Dimensional tolerance
Critical dimensions per drawing*
Surface finish
Ra 0.8 µm on blade airfoil surfaces
Inspection
CMM profile scan of blade surfaces; dimensional inspection of critical features
Documentation
First Article Inspection per AS9102; material certificate per EN 10204 3.1

* Fabrication and inspection were carried out against the customer drawing. Specific callouts are confirmed at quotation and recorded in the inspection report — we do not substitute a generic "shop standard" tolerance for a drawing requirement.

Engineering Challenges

Engineering Challenges

Four constraints shaped every downstream decision. Each one on its own is routine; together they determined the machine, the setup count and the toolpath strategy.

  1. 1

    Restricted blade access

    The gap between adjacent blades limits both cutter diameter and shank clearance. As the cutter works toward the hub, the available approach angle narrows and the risk of shank or holder collision against the neighbouring blade rises sharply. Tool length had to be kept as short as the geometry allowed while still reaching the root of each passage, and every toolpath was checked against the full holder assembly — not just the cutting flutes.

  2. 2

    Complex curved surfaces

    Each blade is a compound-curved airfoil, not a ruled surface. Holding a consistent Ra 0.8 µm finish across the blade requires continuous control of the tool orientation relative to the surface normal. An indexed 3+2 approach would have left facet marks and inconsistent cusp heights between passes, so continuous simultaneous motion was required rather than a series of fixed-angle cuts.

  3. 3

    Datum stability

    The dimensional relationship between the hub, the bore and the blade tips cannot be re-established accurately once the part is unclamped. Any secondary setup introduces a datum transfer error that would show up as blade-to-blade profile variation. The blade-to-hub relationship therefore had to be maintained within a single clamping, from roughing through to finishing.

  4. 4

    Inconel 718 machinability

    Inconel 718 work-hardens rapidly and retains strength at elevated cutting temperatures. Cutting forces and heat concentrate at the tool edge, which makes chip evacuation and thermal load the controlling variables. Poor parameter selection in this material produces surface integrity problems — tensile residual stress, a work-hardened layer, or micro-cracking — that are not visible to the eye but matter on a rotating part.

Manufacturing Strategy

Manufacturing Strategy

Five decisions, each traceable to one of the challenges above. The machine was selected to serve the geometry — not the other way round.

  1. 1

    Machine: DMG MORI DMU 50

    A 5-axis simultaneous machining centre with B-axis tilt and a 360° rotary C-axis. It was selected for the combination of rotary range and structural rigidity needed to hold tool orientation on the blade surfaces while cutting a nickel superalloy. Rigidity matters here because Inconel 718 punishes any compliance in the setup with chatter and rapid tool wear.

  2. 2

    Simultaneous 5-axis, not indexed 3+2

    Blade finishing used continuous simultaneous 5-axis motion rather than indexed 3+2 positioning. Indexed machining locks the tool at a fixed angle for each cut, which leaves visible facet boundaries on a compound curve. Continuous motion keeps the cutter in contact with the surface at a controlled, continuously varying angle, which is what produced the consistent finish across the airfoil.

  3. 3

    Single primary setup

    The part was planned around one primary setup so that hub, bore and blade geometry all remained referenced to a single machine datum. This removed the datum transfer step between roughing and finishing entirely. Where a subsequent operation was unavoidable, it was planned to reference the same datum features rather than establishing a new one.

  4. 4

    Toolpath strategy

    Toolpaths were generated from the customer 3D model with explicit tool-axis control and collision checking against the adjacent blades and the hub. Cutting parameters were selected to maintain constant tool engagement on the airfoil rather than constant step-over — a meaningful difference in Inconel 718, where sudden changes in engagement angle drive both tool wear and surface integrity.

  5. 5

    Machining sequence

    Roughing removed the bulk of the material while leaving a controlled allowance, followed by semi-finishing and then finishing passes on the blade surfaces. Hub and mounting features were completed within the same clamping. Separating roughing from finishing allows stress redistribution to occur before the final passes, so the finished geometry is not distorted by material removed after it.

Material

Material — Inconel 718

Inconel 718 is a precipitation-hardening nickel-chromium superalloy. It is specified where a part must retain strength at elevated temperature and resist oxidation and creep — turbine engines, nuclear internals, deep-sea oil and gas equipment, and cryogenic service.

Those same properties are what make it difficult to machine. The alloy work-hardens quickly, has low thermal conductivity (so heat stays at the cutting edge rather than leaving with the chip), and maintains high strength at the temperature generated during cutting. The practical consequences are higher cutting forces, concentrated heat at the tool edge, and a hard surface layer if a pass is taken too lightly or a tool is allowed to dwell and rub.

Every batch is supplied with EN 10204 3.1 material certification, so the composition and mechanical properties of the stock are documented before any cutting begins.

Designation
UNS N07718 / AMS 5662
Alloy type
Nickel-chromium, precipitation hardening
Key property
Retains strength at elevated temperature
Machining note
Work-hardens rapidly; low thermal conductivity
Hardness
Per material certificate*
Certification
EN 10204 3.1 supplied with every batch
Related alloys
Inconel 625 / 600 / 601, X-750, Hastelloy C-276

* Hardness and mechanical properties are taken from the mill certificate for the specific batch supplied, not quoted from a generic datasheet.

Technical Specifications

Technical Specifications

The four figures that define this part.

  • 248 mmOutside diameter
  • 17Curved blades
  • ±0.005 mmCritical dimensions*
  • Ra 0.8 µmBlade airfoil finish

* Achieved on critical dimensions as defined on the customer drawing. This is a dimensional tolerance, not a profile-of-a-surface callout — the two are not interchangeable and we report them separately. Figures describe this specific part and are not a blanket guarantee for other geometries.

Inspection & Verification

Inspection & Verification

Three distinct activities. They are often conflated in supplier marketing — they are not the same thing.

  • CMM profile scan

    The blade airfoil surfaces were scanned on a coordinate measuring machine and compared against the nominal geometry. The point of a scan, as opposed to discrete point measurement, is that deviation is evaluated across the whole surface — so a localised high spot between measured points is still detected. This is the only practical way to verify a compound-curved airfoil.

  • Dimensional inspection

    Critical features — bore, mounting datum and hub dimensions — were measured against the drawing and recorded in the inspection report. This covers the features that govern how the impeller locates and seals in its assembly, which is where fit problems originate if they are wrong.

  • First Article Inspection per AS9102

    A first article inspection documenting measured results for the characterised features. One clarification we make deliberately: AS9102 is a first article inspection standard, not a certification. We report "FAI per AS9102" because that is accurate. A supplier claiming to be "AS9102 certified" is describing something that does not exist.

Final Result

Final Result

Tolerance
Critical dimensions to drawing*
Surface finish
Ra 0.8 µm on airfoils
Inspection
CMM profile + dimensional report
Documentation
AS9102 FAI + EN 10204 3.1
Setup
Single primary setup
Lead time
8 business days

The first article was accepted to the specified drawing and inspection requirements. Results shown are specific to this project and depend on part geometry, material, tolerance and inspection requirements — they are not a blanket capability guarantee.

What This Case Demonstrates

What This Case Demonstrates

What a buyer can reasonably infer about our capability from this one part — and what they should still ask about their own.

  • Complex geometry held in one setup

    Seventeen curved blades with restricted access were completed around a single primary datum. This is the capability that matters when your part cannot tolerate re-fixturing — see our 5-axis CNC machining services.

  • Nickel superalloys cut under control

    Inconel 718 was machined with attention to tool engagement and thermal load, not simply at reduced parameters. We cut 718, 625, 600, X-750 and Hastelloy C-276 under the same discipline.

  • Verification that matches the geometry

    Compound curves were verified by CMM scan rather than point sampling, and dimensional features were measured separately against the drawing. Reports ship with the part.

  • Honest documentation language

    We state "FAI per AS9102" because that is what it is, and we do not claim certifications we do not hold. On a supplier evaluation, the way a vendor describes its own documentation is itself a signal.

  • Prototype through to production

    The same planning and inspection approach applies whether the order is a single first article or a repeat run — the process does not change when the quantity does.

  • Material traceability from the start

    EN 10204 3.1 certification is standard on every batch, so composition and mechanical properties are documented before cutting begins rather than reconstructed afterwards.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Was this impeller machined from solid or from a cast blank?+
Machined from solid. Machining from solid eliminates the variables that come with cast blanks — porosity, inconsistent machining allowance, and the datum ambiguity of a near-net shape. The trade-off is that all material removal happens on the machine, which is why the roughing strategy and stress management between roughing and finishing matter. We can work from customer-supplied castings where the drawing specifies one.
Can you machine impellers with a tighter blade gap than this one?+
It depends on the ratio of blade height to passage width, which governs the maximum tool diameter and the shank clearance available at the hub. Send the model and we will assess tool access before quoting — this is the first thing we check, because it determines whether the part is machinable at all and at what cost.
What is the largest impeller diameter you can machine?+
Our milling work envelope is 800 × 600 × 500 mm. Within that, the practical limit for an impeller is usually set by blade access and by the rotary axis load capacity rather than by the linear envelope. Send the diameter, blade count and material and we will confirm feasibility.
Do you supply CMM reports with every part, or only on request?+
A dimensional inspection report is standard with every shipment, not an optional extra. For parts with compound-curved surfaces like this impeller, the report is based on a CMM scan of the surface rather than discrete point measurement, because point measurement alone can miss a localised deviation between measured points.
Is AS9102 a certification?+
No. AS9102 is a first article inspection standard that defines how FAI results are documented. It is not a certification a company can hold. We state "FAI per AS9102" because that is accurate. If a supplier describes itself as "AS9102 certified", it is worth asking what they mean.
What do you need to quote a similar part?+
A 3D model (STEP, IGES, Parasolid or SolidWorks) plus a dimensioned 2D PDF drawing. The drawing matters as much as the model, because it carries the GD&T callouts, surface finish requirements and inspection expectations. With both, we return a DFM review and quotation — typically within 24 hours.
Can you hold the same tolerance on a repeat production run?+
Yes, with process control appropriate to the volume. For repeat runs we add in-process inspection at defined intervals and, where the volume justifies it, SPC on critical dimensions. The first article establishes that the process can produce the part; the control plan is what keeps it there across the run.

Request a CNC Machining Quote

Send your 3D model and dimensioned drawing for a free DFM review and quotation — typically within 24 hours. If your part has restricted tool access or is in a nickel superalloy, tell us in the notes; that is where we start.

Upload CAD / Request Quote →

Recommended Reading